Public comments destroy signal. Zero feedback creates blindness. This channel provides a closed, invite-only space for educators, researchers, and institutional readers to submit method concerns, interpretation challenges, and context corrections.
Public comments are disabled because they incentivize performance over precision and attract noise over signal.
This channel is peer review without performativity. It allows serious readers to challenge methods, offer alternative interpretations, and correct contextual errors without public spectacle.
Faculty, PhD candidates, and postdoctoral researchers working in sociology, behavioral economics, consumer psychology, or related fields.
Policy researchers, think tank analysts, and institutional research teams working with youth behavior data.
University instructors using Fomofiles data in coursework or research training.
Sampling issues, question design flaws, statistical interpretation errors, or data collection inconsistencies.
Alternative readings of data, overlooked variables, or contextual factors that change conclusions.
Cultural, regional, or temporal context that was missed or misrepresented in published insights.
Patterns noticed across multiple weeks or months that suggest systematic issues or emerging trends.
Send feedback to: research@fomofiles.in
Include:
Response time: All feedback is reviewed within 7 days. Substantive concerns are addressed publicly in revision history or methodology updates.
Not a general contact form. For media inquiries, data licensing, or collaboration proposals, use standard contact channels.
Not a debate forum. This is for substantive methodological or interpretive feedback, not opinion exchange.
Not anonymous. All feedback must include institutional affiliation to ensure accountability.